Planning a budget for the next fiscal year often means working with many unknowns. Market trends, customer demand, and internal changes can all shift, making forecasting challenging. Finance teams rely on tools that help them see how different choices and assumptions affect financial outcomes.
One common technique is what-if analysis. This process helps teams model different scenarios by changing values in their financial models. What-if analysis is used in many industries, but it plays a central role in budgeting and planning.
Key Takeaways from this Article |
|---|
|
What is a What-If Analysis?
What-if analysis is a technique that shows how changes in certain variables affect the results of a financial model. Finance teams adjust input values in formulas and observe how those changes influence budget outcomes.
Think of it like testing different routes to work. You might ask "what if I take the highway instead of side streets?" to see which saves time. Similarly, finance teams ask "what if sales grow by 15% instead of 10%?" to see how that affects their budget.
The process involves five core steps:
Define the model: Set up formulas that connect inputs to outputs
Identify variables: Choose which assumptions to test (like growth rates or costs)
Modify inputs: Change the values for selected variables
Observe outcomes: See how the changes affect budget results
Analyze results: Compare scenarios to understand the impact
What-if analysis works with revenue projections, expense planning, headcount budgets, and cash flow forecasts. It transforms single-point estimates into a range of possible outcomes.
Why Finance Teams Use What-If Scenarios for Budget Planning
Budget planning involves many uncertain factors. Sales might grow faster or slower than expected. New competitors could enter the market. Economic conditions change. In fact, a recent survey found that 42% of CFOs are conducting high-frequency proactive scenario planning in response to economic uncertainty, with 46% expressing pessimism about the U.S. economy; 46% are adjusting supply chains to reduce tariffs' impact while 39% are implementing technology to reduce costs. What-if scenarios help finance teams prepare for these possibilities.
Instead of creating one budget based on best guesses, teams build multiple versions. Each version tests different assumptions about key business drivers. This approach reveals how sensitive the budget is to various factors.
What-if scenarios provide several advantages:
Risk assessment: Identify which variables have the biggest impact on financial results
Contingency planning: Prepare responses for different business conditions
Stakeholder alignment: Show leadership the range of possible outcomes
Decision support: Compare options before committing resources
For FY'26 planning, scenarios might test different economic conditions, competitive pressures, or internal growth strategies. Teams can then choose the most realistic assumptions and prepare backup plans.
Three Types of What-If Analysis
What-if analysis uses different methods depending on the question being asked. The three main types are scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, and goal seek analysis.
Type | Purpose | Budget Application |
|---|---|---|
Scenario analysis | Tests multiple variables at once | Compares best-case, base-case, worst-case budget versions |
Sensitivity analysis | Changes one variable at a time | Shows how headcount changes affect total expenses |
Goal seek analysis | Finds inputs needed for specific targets | Calculates sales required to hit profit goals |
Scenario analysis
Scenario analysis creates complete budget versions with different sets of assumptions. A typical approach uses three scenarios: optimistic (best-case), realistic (base-case), and pessimistic (worst-case).
Each scenario might change multiple variables simultaneously. The best-case version could assume higher sales growth, lower churn, and successful product launches. The worst-case version might model economic downturn, increased competition, and delayed product releases.
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis changes one variable while keeping others constant. This method shows which factors have the most influence on budget outcomes.
For example, a team might test how different headcount growth rates (10%, 15%, 20%) affect total compensation costs. Or they might see how various marketing spend levels impact customer acquisition.
Goal seek analysis
Goal seek analysis works backward from desired results. Teams set a target outcome and find the input values needed to achieve it.
If leadership wants to reach $10M in revenue, goal seek can calculate the required sales growth rate or customer acquisition numbers. This approach helps set realistic targets and identify necessary actions.
How to Build a Budget What-If Model in 5 Steps
Creating an effective what-if model requires systematic planning. The model connects key business drivers to financial outcomes through formulas.
1. Define objectives and baseline
Start with clear goals for the FY'26 budget. Common objectives include revenue targets, profitability goals, or cash flow requirements. Then build a baseline model using current business data and realistic assumptions.
The baseline serves as the starting point for all scenarios. It should reflect the most likely outcome based on current trends and management expectations.
2. Select key drivers and assumptions
Identify the variables that most influence budget outcomes. Common drivers include:
Revenue factors: Sales growth rate, customer acquisition, pricing changes
Cost factors: Headcount growth, salary inflation, marketing spend
External factors: Economic conditions, competitive pressure, market trends
Focus on the 5-7 most impactful drivers. Too many variables make models complex and hard to interpret.
3. Build driver-based formulas
Create formulas that link each driver to relevant budget line items. For example, headcount growth should connect to salary expenses, benefits, office costs, and equipment purchases.
Test the formulas to ensure they produce logical results. A 10% increase in sales staff should increase both compensation costs and potential revenue.
4. Create best, base and worst cases
Develop three scenarios with different assumption sets:
Best case: Optimistic but achievable assumptions (top 25% outcome)
Base case: Most likely assumptions based on current trends
worst case: Conservative assumptions accounting for potential risks
Document the reasoning behind each assumption. This helps stakeholders understand the scenarios and builds confidence in the analysis.
5. Compare outputs and refine
Review results across all scenarios. Look for patterns and identify which drivers create the biggest differences between cases.
Validate the outputs against historical performance and industry benchmarks. Adjust assumptions or formulas if results seem unrealistic.
What-If Analysis Tools in Excel and FP&A Software
Teams can perform what-if analysis using spreadsheet tools or dedicated FP&A (Financial Planning and Analysis) platforms. Each approach offers different capabilities.
Tool | Best For | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
Goal Seek in Excel | Finding single input values | Only changes one variable |
Scenario Manager in Excel | Comparing multiple assumption sets | Limited to 32 changing cells |
Data Tables in Excel | Testing ranges of values | Maximum two variables |
FP&A platforms | Real-time collaboration and complex models | Requires platform access |
Excel what-if analysis tools
Excel provides three built-in tools for what-if analysis, all located under the Data tab in the What-If Analysis dropdown menu.
Goal Seek finds the input value needed to reach a specific result. For example, it can calculate the sales growth rate required to hit a $5M revenue target.
Scenario Manager saves different sets of input values and switches between them. Teams can create "Conservative Growth," "Aggressive Expansion," and "Cost-Cutting" scenarios, then compare results side by side.
Data Tables test how changing one or two variables affects formula outcomes. A data table might show how different marketing spend levels ($50K, $75K, $100K) impact customer acquisition costs.
FP&A software capabilities
Modern FP&A platforms like Abacum offer advanced what-if analysis features. These tools connect to multiple data sources, enable real-time collaboration, and handle complex multi-dimensional models. The AI in Financial Planning and Analysis market is expected to reach USD 4,766.4 million by 2034, rising from USD 240.6 million in 2024. This represents a remarkable CAGR of 34.8%, with machine learning dominating the technology segment at 39.78% market share.
Teams can adjust assumptions and see results update automatically across all connected reports. Multiple users can work on scenarios simultaneously, and changes sync in real-time.
Budget What-If Analysis Examples
Real-world examples show how different types of businesses apply what-if analysis to budget planning.
SaaS revenue scenarios
A software company models three annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth scenarios for FY'26:
Conservative: 15% growth from $8M to $9.2M ARR
Target: 25% growth from $8M to $10M ARR
Stretch: 35% growth from $8M to $10.8M ARR
Each scenario affects customer success team size, support costs, and infrastructure spending. The model shows how different growth rates impact profitability and cash flow.
Headcount sensitivity analysis
A growing company tests how different hiring plans affect expenses:
Scenario A: Add 10 employees at $80K average salary = $800K additional cost
Scenario B: Add 15 employees at $80K average salary = $1.2M additional cost
Scenario C: Add 20 employees at $80K average salary = $1.6M additional cost
The analysis includes related costs like benefits (30% of salary), equipment ($2K per person), and office space expansion.
Cash runway goal seek
A startup uses goal seek to extend cash runway. With $2M in the bank and $200K monthly burn, they have 10 months of runway.
Goal seek calculates the cost reduction needed to reach 18 months of runway. The analysis shows they need to cut monthly burn to $111K, requiring $89K in monthly savings.
Common What-If Analysis Mistakes
Many teams make predictable errors when building budget scenarios. Recognizing these pitfalls improves analysis quality.
Unrealistic assumptions lead to scenarios that don't reflect actual business conditions. Teams might model 100% sales growth or zero churn rates that have never been achieved.
Solution: Base assumptions on historical data and industry benchmarks. Involve department heads who understand operational constraints.
Overly complex models become difficult to maintain and prone to errors. Adding too many variables or intricate formulas makes scenarios hard to interpret.
Solution: Focus on the 5-7 most impactful drivers. Keep formulas simple and document all assumptions clearly.
Ignoring variable relationships causes unrealistic results. For example, modeling higher sales without increasing customer success costs or support staff.
Solution: Map out how key variables affect each other. Ensure formulas capture these relationships accurately.
Poor documentation makes scenarios impossible to understand later. Teams forget which assumptions were used or how scenarios differ from each other.
Solution: Create a summary table showing key assumptions for each scenario. Include the reasoning behind major changes.
Interpreting Results and Aligning Stakeholders
After building scenarios, teams need to interpret results and communicate findings effectively. This process transforms raw analysis into actionable insights.
Start by comparing key metrics across scenarios. Focus on revenue, expenses, profit margins, and cash flow. Look for patterns that reveal which assumptions have the biggest impact.
Create summary tables or charts that highlight the differences between scenarios. Visual presentations help stakeholders understand the range of possible outcomes quickly.
When presenting to leadership, emphasize the business implications rather than technical details:
Risk exposure: Which scenarios create the biggest threats to company goals?
Resource requirements: What investments are needed for different growth paths?
Decision points: When will the team know which scenario is materializing?
Contingency plans: What actions can be taken if assumptions prove incorrect?
Document the decisions made based on scenario analysis. This creates a record for future reference and helps track how well the analysis predicted actual outcomes.
Drive Strategic Planning with Abacum
Abacum provides purpose-built tools for budget what-if analysis and scenario planning. The platform connects financial data from multiple sources and enables real-time collaboration on budget models.
Teams can adjust key assumptions and see results flow through connected reports automatically. Multiple users can work on scenarios simultaneously, with changes syncing across the platform.
Abacum supports driver-based budgeting, where changes to business metrics like headcount or customer acquisition automatically update related expenses and revenue projections.
The platform handles complex multi-dimensional models while maintaining the flexibility that finance teams need for strategic planning.
Request a demo to see how Abacum streamlines budget scenario planning and what-if analysis.
